The Sophists posited, and Tim Donaghy deposited and Sheed's requisite neo-orthodoxy drove the submission of the forms to a degree that the importance of the pathos outweighed the logos. Take the Malice in the Palace, for example, as a situation that can be looked at through the fundamentalist and not-incorrect Neitzschean ethical lens that the transubstantiation of the 3 ball, (from down town!) exists not for you and I to grasp, but for eternity.

Does the symbol presuppose the meaning of the intentionality of something both divine and not-divine? Can Sheed, in the low post as an underrated rebounder and defender bring us to a realization that our definitions cannot subsume the solipsistic paradox of the infinite and ultimately meaningful? And lets talk about technical fouls, the T, and getting T-ed up tee, T, oh Tee of my teE.

Advertisement

A tautology of misinterpreted semoitic transient experiences, NBA basket-ball, style and realness.The modality of the transmission of the arc of a shot and communicating to David Stern. Cognitive syntax and unyielding nature present the pre-formal language of the immediate and dynamic structure.

Sheed interruptus of the Sheed interregnum.